CO129-603-1 Education Department- revised grant code 5-2-1947 - 14-4-1948 — Page 14

P.S. I presume you

9

satisfactory

would prefer to 14

have a

raised

answer

to the parits

by the A.C.E.C. before additional

definitely

expenditure is approved? (see para. 2gdraft)

D.8.W.

Jape

29/9

15. Miso &.M. A. Moid (Min. of Edn)

Mr. Wallace

29-9-47

Since writing the above, the letter all

No.15 has

come

pouit

the in, guring

ruling an

Robison raised at (e) of No. 12. The Rowe

has agreed with

made

to

the addition which I have

the draft, and that a copy of the

letter should

a

૧૦

to M.K.

D. 8. Why to 34/9

!

Miss Whyte

I have dictated a savingram on the basis of your draft, leaving out, however, reference to the errors referred to in paragraph 2. I note that these were the subject of semi-official correspondence and if it is necessary to say anything more on them, I think that had better be done semi-officially too.

I agree that we had better let the Treasury know what we have done, reference No.14 on the file.

1/12 16 To H.Keny. Sow: 784 (4:19)

Mis, htt

F.A aft.ft

Miss Why to

drafi repler

Trañain for

Lager

20.10.47.

Cons:-

23

conson.

a

له

wh? Powell's late as

私の

2

LiMortain.

3077